When Leaders Can No Longer Switch Off
It used to be loud. Now it wears a calendar full of meetings and a quarterly review that says "exceeds expectations." This is a case study about leaders who look completely fine from the outside — and feel something different on the inside.*
Brigitte Pfeifer-Schmöller
Published May 17, 2026
For years, leadership was considered a career advantage. More influence. More autonomy. More meaning. More engagement.
Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace 2026 report says that’s changed. Since 2022, manager engagement has dropped nine percentage points. The historical “engagement premium” of being a manager — the small but real boost that came with carrying responsibility — has nearly vanished. Managers today are barely more engaged than the people they lead.
What Gallup describes at the macro level, we have been watching at the individual level for years!
We brought the 24 most recent leadership profiles from our ongoing assessment practice together into a single picture. The instrument: a scientifically validated questionnaire on work-related behavior and experience patterns, used not as a clinical diagnostic but as a structured baseline for leadership development.
The result was clearer than we expected.
62% of participants showed health-critical pressure patterns. Four were severe. Eleven more showed clear warning signs along a single dominant axis.
Fig. 1 — Results.
These leaders were not disengaged. They were not underperforming. Most still reported strong professional ambition, meaningful success experiences and good perceived social support. From a traditional performance perspective, almost all of them would appear completely healthy. But internally, something was eroding.
The most important finding wasn’t about the leaders who are visibly struggling. It was about the eleven who aren’t — yet. There show up fully functional, respected, productive (yes, even high performers) and reliable under pressure. And already showing measurable warning signs.
When engagement surveys still look healthy while clarity, energy and decision quality begin to drift — that’s where the blind spot lives. And it sits exactly inside the people carrying the most responsibility.
The case study explores three questions in detail:
- What pattern actually dominated the cohort — and why it isn’t what most organizations measure
- Why Gallup’s macro findings and these individual profiles tell the same story from opposite directions
- What needs to change in how organizations think about leadership capability — beyond performance optimization
Read the full case study to see the pattern view across all 24 profiles, the specific findings, and what they imply for senior leadership development today.
© 2026 Product Leaders Consulting GmbH & Product Leaders Inc.
Members get the full version
Create a free account or log in to read the complete content.